Research Methodology for subject/discipline
Research methodology describing how the study was conducted. It
includes; research design, Study population, sample and sample size,
methods of data collection, methods of data analysis and anticipation of
the study. Research methodology refers to a philosophy of research process. It
includes the assumptions and values that serve a rationale for research and the
standards or criteria the researcher uses for collecting and interpreting data
and reaching at conclusions (Martin and Amin, 2005:63). In other words research
methodology determines the factors such as how to write hypothesis and what
level of evidence is necessary to make decisions on whether to accept or reject
the hypothesis. Research Methodology is the complete plan of attack on the
central research problem. It provides the overall structure
for the procedures that the researcher follows, the data that the
researcher collects, and the data analyses that the researcher conducts, thus
involves planning. It is a plan with the central goal of solving the
research problem in mind.
Research Methods
Survey Method:
Surveys involve collecting information, usually from fairly large
groups of people, by means of questionnaires but other techniques such as interviews
or telephoning may also be used. There are different types of survey. The most
straightforward type (the “one shot survey”) is administered to a sample of
people at a set point in time. Another type is the “before and after survey”
which people complete before a major event or experience and then
againafterwards.2.
Experiments Method:
People who take part in research involving experiments might
be asked to complete various tests to measure their cognitive abilities
(e.g.word recall, attention, concentration, reasoning ability etc.) usually
verbally,
on paper or by computer. The results of different groups are then compared.Participants
should not be anxious about performing well but simply do their best.
The aim of these tests is not to judge people or measure so-called
intelligence, but to look for links between performance and other factors.
Case Study Method:
Case study research involves an in-depth study of an individual or
group of individuals. Case studies often lead to testable hypotheses
and allow us to study rare phenomena. Case studies should not be
used to determine cause and effect, and they have limited use for making
accurate predictions.
Observation Method:
Observational trials study health issues in large groups
of people but in natural settings. Studies which involve observing people can bedivided
into two main categories, namely participant observation and
non- participant observation
a) In participant observation studies, the researcher becomes (or is
already) part of the group to be observed. This involves
fitting in, gaining the trust of members of the group and at the same time
remaining sufficiently detached as to be able to carry out the
observation.
b) In non-participant observation studies, the researcher is not part
of the group being studied. The researcher decides in advance precisely what
kind of behaviour is relevant to the study and can be realistically and
ethically observed. The observation can be carried out in a few different ways.
Research Type or Nature of the Research
Descriptive Research
Descriptive research attempts to describe systematically a
situation, problem, phenomenon, service or Programme, or provides information
about, say, living condition of a community, or describes attitudes towards an issue.
Explanatory Research:
Explanatory research attempts to clarify why and how there
is a relationship between two or more aspects of a situation or
phenomenon.3.
Exploratory Research:
Exploratory research is undertaken to explore an area where
little is known or to investigate the possibilities of undertaking a particular
research study (feasibility study/ pilot study).
Quantitative Research:
The emphasis of Quantitative research is on collecting and
analyzing numerical data; it concentrates on measuring the scale, range,
frequency etc. of phenomena. This type of research, although harder to design
initially, is usually highly detailed and structured and results can be easily
collated and presented statistically.
Qualitative Research:
Qualitative research is more subjective in nature than
Quantitative research and involves examining and reflecting on the less
tangible aspects of a research subject, e.g. values, attitudes,
perceptions. Although this type of research can be easier to start, it can be
often difficult to interpret and present the findings; the findings can also be
challenged more easily.
Methods of Data Collection
Focus Groups:
Excellent approach to gather in-depth attitudes, beliefs, and
unreliable data from a large group of patrons at one time. Group dynamics might
generate more ideas than individual interviews. Can be effectively used to
focus on details regarding issues found through surveys or other data
collection methods. Participants are not required to read or write. Technique
relies on oral communication. Requires staff time to set up and facilitate
focus group. Requires staff time to identify and schedule participants for
focus group. Requires strong facilitator to guide discussion and ensure
participation by all members. Usually requires special equipment to record and
transcribe focus group discussion.
Interviews:
Good approach to gather in-depth attitudes, beliefs, and unreliable
data from individual patrons. Personal contact with participants might elicit
richer and more detailed responses. Provides an excellent opportunity to probe
and explore questions. Participants do not need to be able to read and
write to respond. Requires staff time and quiet area to conduct interviews.
Requires special equipment to record and transcribe interviews.
Observation:
Excellent approach to discover behaviors provides indicators of
the impact of programs that might be more reliable than data gained by asking
people. Good technique when there are observable products and outcomes.
Requires staff time to observe and record observations. Cannot ask questions of
participants during observation. Might want to use follow-up interviews
to verify observations.
Surveys:
Best for gathering brief written responses on attitudes, beliefs
regarding library programs. Can include both close-ended and open-ended
questions. Can be administered in written form or online. Personal contact with
the participants is not required. Staff and facilities requirements are
minimal, since one employee can easily manage the distribution and collection
of surveys, and issues such as privacy,
quiet areas, etc. are typically not concerns.
Responses are limited to the questions included in the survey.
Participants need to be able to read and write to respond. Takes time to
pre-test a written survey to make sure that your questions are clearly stated.
Relies on participants' perceptions.
Be aware of potential
gaps between participants' responses and reality. Surveys work better after you havedetermined
the range of outcomes that the survey can target. Therefore, surveys may not be
the best initial data collection tool. Questions on surveys can be misunderstood,
especially if they are self-administered and/or if participants do not
understand the context for the survey questions. Survey questions (especially closed-ended
questions) can be limited to what the provider thinks may be the range of
responses.
Tools of Data Collection
Interview Schedule (Open-ended/Close-ended):
This method of data collection is very much like the collection of
data through questionnaire, with little difference which lies in the fact that
schedules (proforma containing a set of questions) are being filled in by the
enumerators who are specially appointed for the purpose. These enumerators
along with schedules, go to respondents, put to them the questions from the
proforma in the order the questions are listed and record the replies in the
space meant for the same in the proforma. In certain situations, schedules may
be handed over to respondents and enumerators may help them in recording their
answers to various questions in the said schedules. Enumerators explain the
aims and objects of the investigation and also remove the difficulties which
any respondent may feel in understanding the implications of a particular
question or the definition or concept of difficult terms.
Questionnaire (Open-ended Question):
This method of data collection is
quite popular, particularly in case of big enquiries. It is being adopted by privateindividuals,
research workers, private and public organisations and even by governments. In
this method a questionnaire is sent (usually by post) to
the persons concerned with a request to answer the questions and return thequestionnaire.
A questionnaire consists of a number of questions printed or typed in a
definite order on a form or set of forms. The questionnaire is mailed to respondents
who are expected to read and understand the questions and write down the reply
in the space meant for the purpose in the questionnaire itself. The respondents
have to answer the questions on their own.
Checklist:
Checklists structure a person’s observation or evaluation of
a performance or artifact. They can be simple lists of
criteria that can be marked
as present or absent, or can provide space for observer comments. These tools can provide consistency over time or between observers. Checklists can be used forCase
Study method.
Rating Scale:
This is a recording form used for measuring individual's
attitudes, aspirations and other psychological and behavioural aspects, and
group behaviour.
Drawing Conclusions
This section of the Research
Gateway is here to give you an idea of how to pull together the analysis and
discussion of your research in order to say what your research actually means.
The conclusion of your research should provide a final critical reflection on
the study and its contribution to literature and the area of investigation. It
should also point to issues that could be pursued in future research. It
answers the ‘so what?’ question that examiners will use to evaluate your work
and gives you the opportunity to demonstrate that you know what your research
means. Conclusions are usually short and should not contain new material. They
are often difficult to write as you are likely to feel that you have said it
all by this stage. As a result, many students simply summarise what they have
said in previous chapters…unfortunately, this is NOT concluding! The conclusion
of your research has three main roles. First, it provides an ending to the
project – as we said above, it provides the opportunity for you to say what
your research means. Second, it provides you with the opportunity to say how
your research can contribute to our understanding of the knowledge in the area,
of current management practice and/ or relevant policy. Third, it leaves the
reader with a final impression of the quality of your work!
Referencing and bibliography
When you are writing an essay,
report, dissertation or any other form of academic writing, your own thoughts
and ideas inevitably build on those of other writers, researchers or teachers.
It is essential that you acknowledge your debt to the sources of data, research
and ideas on which you have drawn by including references to, and full details
of, these sources in your work. Referencing your work allows the reader:
·
To distinguish your own ideas
and findings from those you have drawn from the work of others;
·
To follow up in more detail the
ideas or facts that you have referred to.
Whenever you read or research
material for your writing, make sure that you include in your notes, or on any
photocopied material, the full publication details of each relevant text that
you read. These details should include:
·
Surname(s) and initial(s) of
the author(s);
·
The date of publication;
·
The title of the text;
·
If it is a paper, the title of
the journal and volume number;
·
If it is a chapter of an edited
book, the book's title and editor(s)
the publisher and place of publication;
the publisher and place of publication;
·
The first and last page numbers
if it is a journal article or a chapter in an edited book.
For particularly important points,
or for parts of texts that you might wish to quote word for word, also include
in your notes the specific page reference.
Your source should be
acknowledged every time the point that you make, or the data or other
information that you use, is substantially that of another writer and not your
own. As a very rough guide, while the introduction and the conclusions to your
writing might be largely based on your own ideas, within the main body of your
report, essay or dissertation, you would expect to be drawing on, and thus
referencing your debt to, the work of others in each main section or paragraph.
Some academic disciplines prefer to use footnotes (notes at the
foot of the page) or endnotes (notes at the end of the work) to reference their
writing. Although this method differs in style from the 'author, date' system,
its purpose - to acknowledge the source of ideas, data or quotations without
undue interruption to the flow of the writing - is the same.
Footnote or endnote markers, usually a sequential series of numbers either in brackets or
slightly above the line of writing or printing (superscript), are placed at the
appropriate point in the text. This is normally where you would insert the
author and date if you were using the 'author, date' system described above.
The Research Process
The following order concerning
various steps provides a useful procedural guideline regarding the research
process:
(1) Formulating the research problem;
(2) Extensive literature survey;
(3) Developing the hypothesis;
(4) Preparing the research design;
(5) Determining sample design;
(6) Collecting the data;
(7) Execution of the project;
(8) Analysis of data;
(9) Hypothesis testing;
(10) Generalisations and interpretation, and
(11) Preparation of the report
or presentation of the results, i.e., formal write-up of conclusions reached.
A brief description of the
above stated steps will be helpful.
1. Formulating the research problem: There are two types of research
problems, viz., those which relate to states of nature and those which relate
to relationships between variables. At the very outset the researcher must
single out the problem he wants to study, i.e., he must decide the general area
of interest or aspect of a subject-matter that he would like to inquire into.
Initially the problem may be stated in a broad general way and then the
ambiguities, if any, relating to the problem be resolved.
2. Extensive literature survey: Once the problem is formulated, a
brief summary of it should be written down. It is compulsory for a research
worker writing a thesis for a Ph.D. degree to write a synopsis of the topic and
submit it to the necessary Committee or the Research Board for approval. At
this juncture the researcher should undertake extensive literature survey
connected with the problem. For this purpose, the abstracting and indexing
journals and published or unpublished bibliographies are the first place to go
to. Academic journals, conference proceedings, government reports, books etc.,
must be tapped depending on the nature of the problem. In this process, it
should be remembered that one source will lead to another. The earlier studies,
if any, which are similar to the study in hand should be carefully studied. A
good library will be a great help to the researcher at this stage.
3. Development
of working hypotheses: After extensive literature survey, researcher should
state in clear terms the working hypothesis or hypotheses. Working hypothesis
is tentative assumption made in order to draw out and test its logical or
empirical consequences. As such the manner in which research hypotheses are
developed is particularly important since they provide the focal point for
research. They also affect the manner in which tests must be conducted in the
analysis of data and indirectly the quality of data which is required for the
analysis. In most types of research, the development of working hypothesis
plays an important role. Hypothesis should be very specific and limited to the
piece of research in hand because it has to be tested.
4. Preparing the research design: The research problem having been
formulated in clear cut terms, the researcher will be required to prepare a
research design, i.e., he will have to state the conceptual structure within
which research would be conducted. The preparation of such a design facilitates
research to be as efficient as possible yielding maximal information. In other
words, the function of research design is to provide for the collection of
relevant evidence with minimal expenditure of effort, time and money. But how
all these can be achieved depends mainly on the research purpose. Research
purposes may be grouped into four categories, viz., (i) Exploration, (ii)
Description, (iii) Diagnosis, and (iv) Experimentation
5. Determining sample design: All the items under consideration in any field of inquiry
constitute a ‘universe’ or ‘population’. A complete enumeration of all the
items in the ‘population’ is known as a census inquiry. It can be presumed that
in such an inquiry when all the items are covered no element of chance is left
and highest accuracy is obtained. But in practice this may not be true. Even
the slightest element of bias in such an inquiry will get larger and larger as
the number of observations increases.
6. Collecting the data: In dealing with any real life
problem it is often found that data at hand are inadequate, and hence, it
becomes necessary to collect data that are appropriate. There are several ways
of collecting the appropriate data which differ considerably in context of
money costs, time and other resources at the disposal of the researcher.
7. Execution of the project: Execution of the project is a very important step in the research
process. If the execution of the project proceeds on correct lines, the data to
be collected would be adequate and dependable. The researcher should see that
the project is executed in a systematic manner and in time. If the survey is to
be conducted by means of structured questionnaires, data can be readily
machine-processed. In such a situation, questions as well as the possible
answers may be coded. If the data are to be collected through interviewers,
arrangements should be made for proper selection and training of the
interviewers. The training may be given with the help of instruction manuals
which explain clearly the job of the interviewers at each step.
8. Analysis of data: After the data have been collected, the researcher turns to the
task of analysing them. The analysis of data requires a number of closely
related operations such as establishment of categories, the application of
these categories to raw data through coding, tabulation and then drawing
statistical inferences. The unwieldy data should necessarily be condensed into
a few manageable groups and tables for further analysis
9. Hypothesis-testing: After analysing the data as stated above, the researcher is in a
position to test the hypotheses, if any, he had formulated earlier. Do the
facts support the hypotheses or they happen to be contrary? This is the usual
question which should be answered while testing hypotheses. Various tests, such
as Chi square test, t-test, F-test, have been developed by statisticians for
the purpose. The hypotheses may be tested through the use of one or more of
such tests, depending upon the nature and object of research inquiry.
Hypothesis-testing will result in either accepting the hypothesis or in
rejecting it. If the researcher had no hypotheses to start with,
generalisations established on the basis of data may be stated as hypotheses to
be tested by subsequent researches in times to come.
10. Generalisations and interpretation: If a hypothesis is tested and
upheld several times, it may be possible for the researcher to arrive at
generalisation, i.e., to build a theory. As a matter of fact, the real value of
research lies in its ability to arrive at certain generalisations. If the
researcher had no hypothesis to start with, he might seek to explain his
findings on the basis of some theory. It is known as interpretation. The
process of interpretation may quite often trigger off new questions which in
turn may lead to further researches.
11. Preparation of the report or the thesis: Finally, the researcher has to
prepare the report of what has been done by him. Writing of report must be done
with great care as per objectives.
Comments
Post a Comment